Reviewed by Laurence P. Banville, Esq.Frequently asked questions
What was the Copper-7 IUD and why was it taken off the market?
The Copper-7 was an intrauterine device manufactured by G.D. Searle that was withdrawn from the U.S. market in 1986 amid lawsuits alleging it caused pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, and other serious injuries. Thousands of women filed claims before and after the withdrawal, making it one of the most significant IUD mass-tort cases in U.S. history.
Can I still sue over a Copper-7 IUD injury in New York?
Because the device was pulled decades ago, most direct product-liability claims are time-barred under CPLR §214’s three-year statute of limitations. However, New York’s discovery rule may toll the clock if you only recently connected a diagnosed injury — such as infertility or chronic pelvic pain — to the device. Consulting a NY attorney promptly is essential to evaluate whether any exception applies to your circumstances.
What injuries were linked to the Copper-7 IUD?
Documented injuries include pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy, uterine perforation, septic abortion, and long-term infertility. Some women also reported severe cramping and abnormal bleeding. These injuries formed the basis for the wave of personal injury and products-liability litigation against Searle.
What should I do if I believe I was harmed by a Copper-7 IUD?
Gather all available medical records documenting your IUD placement, removal, and any resulting diagnoses. Under CPLR §214, the three-year period generally runs from the date of injury or discovery — so do not delay. A NY personal injury attorney experienced in medical device litigation can assess your records, identify any applicable tolling arguments, and advise on your options.