ParaGard IUD Lawsuit: NY Claims & Legal Rights

The ParaGard (copper IUD) lawsuit centers on allegations that the device fractures during removal, leaving broken pieces embedded in the uterus or migrating to other organs. Plaintiffs allege that Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, knew of this defect and failed to adequately warn patients and physicians. Cases are currently consolidated in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of Georgia.

Any NY resident who had a ParaGard IUD fracture during or after removal, resulting in injury, surgery, or complications, may be eligible to file a claim. This includes women who required additional procedures to retrieve broken device fragments, experienced uterine perforation, or suffered damage to surrounding organs. A product liability attorney can evaluate whether your specific facts support a claim.

Under CPLR §214, New York generally imposes a 3-year statute of limitations for personal injury product liability claims. The clock typically starts when the injury occurred or was discovered. Because ParaGard fractures are sometimes discovered months or years after removal, the discovery rule may extend your filing window — but you should consult an attorney immediately to protect your rights.

Recoverable damages in a NY ParaGard case may include medical expenses (past and future), lost wages, pain and suffering, and costs related to additional surgeries or fertility treatment. No specific outcome is guaranteed, and damages depend on the facts of each case. Punitive damages may also be available if the manufacturer’s conduct is found to be egregious.

You will need medical records documenting the injury: records showing the device broke or fractured during or after removal, that a fragment was retained, and any additional procedures or surgery you needed as a result. New York's 3-year statute of limitations (CPLR §214) is strict, so gather these records and speak with a product liability attorney as soon as possible.

Product liability lawsuits over the ParaGard IUD name two companies as defendants: Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical. Plaintiffs allege the copper device was defectively designed and that both manufacturers failed to warn patients and physicians about the fracture risk.