Frequently asked questions
What does NY workers’ compensation cover for carpal tunnel?
New York workers’ comp covers all necessary medical treatment—including surgery, physical therapy, and bracing—at no cost to you. If your carpal tunnel prevents you from working at full capacity, you also receive wage-replacement benefits equal to two-thirds of your average weekly wage, up to the state-set maximum. Permanent impairment to your hand or wrist may entitle you to a scheduled loss-of-use award under NY Workers’ Compensation Law §15.
What’s the difference between workers’ comp and a personal injury lawsuit for carpal tunnel?
Workers’ compensation is a no-fault system: you do not need to prove your employer was negligent to collect benefits, but in most cases you cannot sue your employer for additional damages. A personal injury lawsuit is available only if a third party—such as a defective tool manufacturer or a contractor on the job site—caused or contributed to your condition. If a third-party claim is viable, you may pursue both workers’ comp and a civil lawsuit simultaneously.
How do you prove carpal tunnel is work-related in NY?
You must show through medical evidence that your job duties—such as prolonged keyboard use, assembly-line work, or operating vibrating machinery—caused or materially contributed to your carpal tunnel syndrome. An authorized physician must document the diagnosis and establish the occupational connection in writing. Strong claims include consistent medical records, a detailed description of your job tasks, and, where possible, an EMG/nerve-conduction study confirming the severity of the injury.
What if my employer or their insurer disputes my carpal tunnel workers’ comp claim?
Disputed claims are heard by the NY Workers’ Compensation Board, which schedules hearings before a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge. The insurer may arrange an independent medical examination (IME), but you have the right to present your own medical evidence and testimony. Many disputed repetitive-stress claims are won or lost on the quality of medical documentation, which is why legal representation at the hearing stage can make a significant difference in the outcome.